If you’ve been sourcing e-bike components for any length of time, you already know that tire size codes look like alphabet soup. “24-inch” is a nominal diameter — but the actual fit depends entirely on what the label says after those numbers. That’s where ERT0 comes in.
ERT0 stands for European Tire and Rim Technical Organization. It’s the standardized sizing system that tells you exactly whether a tire will work with your rim. A 24-inch e-bike tire will carry an ERT0 code like 47-507 or 50-507, where the first number is width in millimeters and the second is bead seat diameter in millimeters. The “507” is the critical part — that’s what actually determines mechanical compatibility with your rim.
I learned this the hard way a few years back. Ordered a bulk shipment of “24-inch tires” for a fleet of urban delivery bikes, and half of them were 47-507 while the motors needed 50-507. The bead seat diameter didn’t match. Those tires sat in a warehouse for three months while we sorted the return logistics. It cost us more than the price difference on the original order.
For e-bikes specifically, the 24-inch format is common in several distinct applications: folding e-bikes use it because the smaller wheel diameter allows a compact frame fold; compact urban e-bikes use it for the same reason; some cargo e-bikes use 24-inch rear wheels with 20-inch fronts for lower center of gravity; and certain specialized neighborhood EVs use it as a standard format. The point is, “24-inch” alone tells you almost nothing about fitment. You need ERT0.
When I’m evaluating a 24-inch tire for an e-bike application, the questions I ask are: Does the ERT0 match the rim? What’s the weight rating given the added mass of a motor and battery? Is the casing strong enough to handle the torque profile of a hub motor? And — practically — can I get consistent supply in the volumes I need?
Your battery capacity and motor configuration also play a role in tire selection — if you’re spec’ing a complete e-bike system, the tire must handle the weight of that setup reliably. The last question matters more than most procurement guides admit. A technically perfect tire that your supplier can only deliver 200 units at a time with a 12-week lead time is often worse than a slightly heavier-duty alternative that flows reliably through your supply chain. Fleet operators live and die by predictability.
Types of 24-Inch Tires: Which One Does Your Market Need?
Not all 24-inch tires are created equal — and more importantly, not all 24-inch tires serve the same customer. As a B2B buyer, your job is to match the tire to the use case, not to find one tire that “works for everything.” That tire doesn’t exist, and anyone who tells you otherwise is either lying or hasn’t operated a real fleet.
Commuter and Urban Tires
For urban delivery and commuter applications, what you typically see is a 24×1.75 to 24×2.0 width range. These tires prioritize puncture resistance and low rolling resistance over aggressive tread. They’re designed for smooth or mildly cracked asphalt, they’re quiet, and they tend to have relatively long wear lives because the compound is harder.
I generally look for a minimum of 60 TPI (threads per inch) casing for urban e-bike use. Lower TPI means a coarser, heavier tire that’s more prone to cuts and has harsher ride quality. Higher TPI — 120 TPI or more on premium models — gives you a supple casing that conforms to road imperfections and reduces vibration transmitted through the frame. For an e-bike with a motor, you want that suppleness because the motor is already adding unsprung weight and mechanical complexity.
Mountain and Off-Road Tires
24-inch mountain tires for e-bikes are less common than their 26-inch and 27.5-inch counterparts, but they exist — primarily in the kids and youth mountain e-bike segment, and in some specialized fat bike applications. If you’re sourcing for a 24-inch e-mtb, look for a tire with aggressive multi-directional tread, reinforced sidewalls, and a casing designed for lower pressure running. The 24×2.0 to 24×4.0 range covers most fat bike configurations.
One thing I’ll flag: the off-road e-bike tire market is evolving rapidly, and the lines are blurring between “mountain bike” and “e-bike specific” designs. Traditional mountain bike tires often have lighter casings optimized for human-powered climbing. E-bike tires need to handle the motor’s instant torque delivery and higher overall system weight. Make sure whatever you’re specifying is e-bike rated — most major manufacturers now label e-bike compatible tires explicitly.
Fat Tire 24-Inch
The fat tire segment has grown significantly, driven by the popularity of e-fat bikes for beach and snow applications. A 24×3.0 to 24×4.8 tire on a wide rim gives you floatation that lets the bike essentially plane across soft surfaces. In terms of procurement, fat tires have higher raw material content (more rubber per unit), so pricing and margins look different than standard commuter tires. They also have specific rim width requirements — you can’t put a 4.8-inch tire on a standard rim.
Foldable vs. Rigid Bead
One distinction that comes up frequently in procurement conversations: foldable bead versus rigid wire bead. Foldable beads use Kevlar or aramid fibers to create a bead that folds, which reduces shipping volume and makes inventory handling more efficient. Rigid wire bead tires are cheaper to manufacture and slightly more robust against bead damage, but they’re harder to store and ship in bulk.
For most fleet applications, I recommend foldable beads for tires 24×2.0 and above, especially if you’re distributing through retail channels where stores need to manage shelf space and inventory turnover. The cost differential is typically 5-15% depending on brand and volume.
Top 7 Manufacturers of 24-Inch Tires for E-Bikes in 2026
Here’s where I need to be careful about balance. I’m going to walk through the major players in the 24-inch e-bike tire market, and I’ll give you my honest read on where each brand sits — including the limitations. This isn’t a ranked list of winners. It’s a sourcing map.
1. Kenda
Kenda is probably the most widely sourced 24-inch tire in the budget to mid-range e-bike market. Their tires are consistently available, the quality is predictable, and for price-sensitive procurement they’re hard to beat. Kenda’s 24-inch lineup covers commuter, mountain, and fat bike formats.
The limitation with Kenda is that they’re a high-volume manufacturer, and at the low end of their range you can get inconsistent quality between batches. I’ve seen this cause problems for fleet operators who spec Kenda for large-volume orders and then receive a batch that doesn’t meet the same puncture resistance as their previous order. The solution is to buy in container volumes directly from Kenda or their authorized distributors, not spot-purchase from multiple distribution channels.
2. Cheng Shin Rubber (CST)
Cheng Shin — operating under the CST brand in Western markets — is one of the largest tire manufacturers you’ve probably never heard of. Based in Taiwan, they produce a huge volume of tires for many major Western brands under OEM arrangements. Their 24-inch e-bike range is extensive and they’re competitive on price for mid-volume buyers.
What I appreciate about CST from a procurement standpoint is their documentation quality — product spec sheets are detailed and they provide batch-level testing data for larger orders. The tradeoff is that their aesthetic and marketing presence in Western markets is minimal, which can matter if you’re selling to consumers who care about brand perception. For B2B white-label or house-brand programs, CST is an excellent partner.
3. Bafang
Bafang occupies an interesting position in the e-bike ecosystem — they’re primarily known as a motor and drivetrain manufacturer, but they’ve expanded into complete component systems including tires. Their 24-inch tires are designed specifically for e-bike integration, which means motor compatibility is built into the spec. Learn more about Bafang’s official e-bike component lineup.
For buyers sourcing complete e-bike drivetrain packages, Bafang tires can simplify the supply chain by consolidating vendor relationships. The limitation is that Bafang’s tire range is narrower than dedicated tire manufacturers, so if you need a highly specialized configuration, they may not have it.
4. Schwalbe
Schwalbe (German brand, part of the Ralf Bohle group) makes what I consider the premium tier in e-bike tires. Their Marathon E Plus line is widely recognized as one of the most durable and puncture-resistant e-bike tires available, and they explicitly engineer for motor compatibility, high load ratings, and long service life. Check Schwalbe’s official e-bike tire catalog for current specifications.
The honest limitation with Schwalbe is price. At wholesale volumes, you’re typically paying 2-3x what you’d pay for equivalent Kenda or CST products. For a premium fleet operator targeting a high-end customer segment, the economics can work — the Marathon E Plus tires last significantly longer in urban delivery service, which can lower total cost of ownership. For a budget-oriented operator, Schwalbe may be aspirational rather than practical.
5. Michelin
Michelin brings their automotive tire engineering heritage to the e-bike market. Their Power Adventure and Power Cup lines cover e-bike applications including 24-inch formats. The casing quality is excellent, the rubber compounds are sophisticated, and their environmental and safety testing standards are rigorous.
Where Michelin fits in the market is the mid-to-premium segment for consumers who recognize the brand from cars and bicycles. For B2B buyers, Michelin typically requires higher minimum order quantities and has longer lead times than Asian manufacturers. But their technical support and warranty handling are professional-grade.
6. Maxxis
Maxxis is best known in the mountain bike world, but they have an increasingly mature e-bike tire line including 24-inch formats. Their EXO and DD (DoubleDown) casing technologies are relevant for heavier e-bike applications. For buyers targeting the performance and off-road e-bike segment, Maxxis is worth a serious look.
The caveat: Maxxis primarily serves the performance/enduro market, so their 24-inch commuter or urban lineup is thinner than their 26-inch and 27.5-inch offerings. If you’re building a catalog that spans multiple wheel sizes, Maxxis may require juggling multiple supplier relationships.
7. Innova
Innova is a lesser-known player that I include here because they’ve been quietly picking up OEM contracts for e-bike manufacturers, particularly in the 24-inch fat tire segment. Their value proposition is competitive pricing with acceptable quality for light-duty applications.
I wouldn’t spec Innova for a high-mileage commercial fleet without extensive field testing first. But for lower-volume specialty applications — neighborhood EVs, campus bikes, low-speed urban vehicles — they can be a cost-effective option.
24-Inch Tire Specifications: Width, Ply, and Terrain Match
Let’s talk specs, because this is where most procurement mistakes happen. I’ve seen fleet buyers choose tires based on price alone, without understanding how width, ply rating, and terrain compatibility interact.
Width and Rim Compatibility
Tire width and rim width must be matched. The general rule is that your rim inner width should be roughly 40-60% of the tire’s inflated width. For a 24×2.0 tire (approximately 50mm wide), you need a rim with an inner width of roughly 20-30mm. Run a tire that’s too narrow for your rim and you risk bead unseating and poor handling. Run a tire that’s too wide for your rim and the casing will be unstable, leading to uneven wear and increased puncture risk.
In e-bike applications, the added weight and power delivery make proper width matching even more critical than on a conventional bike. A tire that’s borderline on rim width on a pedal bike becomes a safety issue on an e-bike under motor torque.
Ply and Casing Ratings
E-bike tires use various rating systems. The most common you’ll encounter:
- TPI (Threads Per Inch): Higher TPI = lighter, more supple casing (premium). Lower TPI = heavier, more robust (value/e-bike).
- Ply rating: In fat tire contexts, you’ll see 4-ply, 6-ply, or 8-ply ratings borrowed from automotive/ATV standards. More plies = more puncture resistant but heavier and higher rolling resistance.
- E-bike specific ratings: Schwalbe, Continental, and other premium brands have introduced specific e-bike rating systems that test for torque resistance, weight capacity, and high-speed run (the “e” in e-bike typically means the tire has passed testing for speeds up to 50 km/h).
For most urban delivery and commuter e-bike applications, I look for:
- Casing: minimum 60 TPI
- E-bike rating where available
- Width: matched to rim and use case
- Load index: at minimum, verify the tire’s load rating exceeds your fully loaded vehicle weight divided by two (since weight is split between front and rear)
Terrain Decision Matrix
Here’s a practical framework I use for matching tire specs to terrain — which brings us to the motor question. If you’re running a brushless hub motor setup, your torque profile is fundamentally different from a mid-drive, and that affects your casing choice more than most buyers realize.
| Terrain | Recommended Width | Tread Pattern | Pressure Range |
|---|---|---|---|
| Smooth urban asphalt | 24×1.75 to 24×2.0 | Slick or shallow file | 50-70 PSI |
| Mixed urban (some cracks) | 24×2.0 to 24×2.35 | Light file tread | 40-60 PSI |
| Gravel paths | 24×2.0 to 24×2.5 | File or small knob | 30-50 PSI |
| Off-road/mountain | 24×2.1 to 24×2.6 | Multi-directional knobs | 20-40 PSI |
| Fat bike (sand/snow) | 24×3.0 to 24×4.8 | Aggressive knobs | 8-20 PSI |
The terrain your customer’s vehicles actually operate on will determine everything else. This is where getting out of the spreadsheet and actually riding the routes matters. I’ve seen too many buyers spec tires for “urban use” without defining whether that means smooth bike lanes or rough last-mile delivery paths. The spec changes dramatically.
Tube vs Tubeless: Which 24-Inch Setup for Your E-Bike?
This is the question I’m asked most often by fleet operators making the transition from conventional bikes to e-bikes. The answer has evolved significantly in the past three years.
Traditional Tube-Type Systems
The majority of 24-inch e-bike tires on the market today are still tube-type — they require a separate inner tube installed inside the tire casing. This system is simpler to repair in the field, tubes are cheap and universally available, and the tire options are far more numerous.
For B2B fleet operations, the practical advantage of tube-type systems is maintenance simplicity. Any mechanic can change a tube in under five minutes with basic tools. Tubeless repair requires sealant, specific rim configurations, and more specialized training. If your fleet is maintained by multiple technicians across different locations, tube-type systems offer a significant operational advantage.
The downside is puncture resistance. Even with thorn-resistant or self-sealing tubes, tube-type systems are more vulnerable to flats than properly set up tubeless systems.
Tubeless Ready Systems
Tubeless-compatible 24-inch tires are increasingly available from major brands. In a tubeless setup, the tire seats tightly against the rim with an airtight seal, and you fill the cavity with liquid sealant that automatically seals small punctures as they occur. The system was pioneered in mountain biking and has migrated to e-bike applications because commercial operators started demanding it.
The numbers are compelling. In real-world fleet testing, well-maintained tubeless systems can reduce puncture-related downtime by 60-80% compared to tube-type systems in the same operating environment. For a delivery fleet where every flat costs money in labor and missed deliveries, that’s a significant total cost of ownership advantage.
But here’s the complication: tubeless requires specific rim hardware. Your rims must be tubeless-ready (which means a specific rim bed design and valve stem configuration), and you need to carry sealant and injector tools for field repairs. The system also requires periodic maintenance — sealant degrades over time and needs refreshing, typically every 3-6 months depending on climate.
My Recommendation for 24-Inch E-Bike Fleets
For most commercial 24-inch e-bike fleets, I recommend a pragmatic middle path: use tubeless-ready tires on tubeless-ready rims, but keep a tube as a spare in the vehicle. This gives you the puncture resistance advantage of tubeless for day-to-day operations while preserving a simple backup repair path if you encounter a catastrophic puncture that sealant can’t handle.
The only scenario where I’d recommend staying with pure tube-type is if your maintenance operation is not yet equipped to handle tubeless — if your technicians aren’t trained, your rims aren’t tubeless-compatible, and your inventory system can’t accommodate the additional complexity. Don’t adopt tubeless just because it’s trendy. Adopt it when your operations are ready.
B2B Buying Guide: MOQ, Pricing Tiers, and OEM Requirements
Now let’s talk about the commercial side, because the technical specs only matter if you can source the product reliably and at a price that makes your business work.
Minimum Order Quantities
MOQ structures for 24-inch e-bike tires vary significantly by manufacturer and by whether you’re buying direct or through distribution:
- Asian manufacturers (Kenda, CST, Maxxis Asia): Container-load MOQ typically 20ft = 1,000-2,000 units depending on tire size and packaging. Some distributors offer mixed-SKU 20ft containers starting at 500-800 units total.
- European manufacturers (Schwalbe, Continental): Typically higher MOQ for direct orders, minimum 500-1,000 units per SKU. Distributor network orders may allow lower per-SKU quantities with price premiums.
- OEM programs: Full container loads, typically 1x40ft = 2,500-4,000 units per SKU minimum. OEM programs require significant commitment and typically involve 6-12 month development timelines for custom specifications.
For most independent B2B buyers starting out, working through a distributor rather than direct-to-manufacturer gives you flexibility on MOQ while still accessing competitive pricing. As your volumes grow, direct container programs become viable and can reduce unit costs by 15-30%.
Pricing Tiers
Based on recent sourcing data for 24-inch e-bike tires, here’s the approximate wholesale pricing landscape:
- Budget tier (Kenda, CST basic models, Innova): FOB Asia $4-8 per tire at container volume
- Mid tier (Kenda premium, CST performance, Bafang e-bike specific): FOB Asia $8-15 per tire at container volume
- Premium tier (Schwalbe Marathon E Plus, Michelin Power E, Continental RideTour): FOB Asia $18-35 per tire at container volume; distributor pricing in Western markets typically $25-50 per tire
These are directional figures. Actual pricing depends on your volume, payment terms, whether you’re buying EXW, FOB, CIF, or DDP, and current raw material conditions. Rubber prices fluctuate, and tire pricing tracks them with a lag of typically 2-4 months.
I always recommend requesting FOB pricing on at least two incoterms bases before committing to a large order. A tire quoted at $6 FOB Asia may actually be more expensive landed than a $12 tire quoted CIF your port, depending on freight rates.
OEM and Custom Specification Programs
If you’re buying at sufficient volume — generally 5,000+ units per year across SKUs — most major manufacturers will work with you on custom specifications. This might include:
- Custom tread compounds optimized for your operating environment
- Proprietary casing configurations or bead designs
- Custom branding (your logo, their brand, or full private label)
- Custom packaging for retail or fleet distribution
OEM programs typically require 12-18 month commitment horizon, tooling or mold investment fees (which are amortized or refundable at volume), rigidity on specification sign-off before production, and payment terms that favor the manufacturer (often 30% deposit, 70% before shipment).
The advantage of OEM is margin control and brand differentiation. The risk is inventory commitment. A wrong spec in an OEM order is expensive.
Payment Terms and Currency
Most Asian tire manufacturers quote in USD and expect T/T payment (30% deposit, 70% balance before shipment). L/C at sight or D/P are possible for established relationships. Be aware of currency risk if you’re buying in USD but selling in EUR or GBP — hedging or building FX contingency into your pricing is advisable.
Veelgestelde vragen
Q: What is 24 inch tire in ERT0?
A: The ERT0 system expresses a tire’s dimensions as width in millimeters followed by the bead seat diameter in millimeters. For a 24-inch e-bike tire, common ERT0 sizes include 47-507, 50-507, 54-507, and 62-507. The “507” is the bead seat diameter — the critical measurement for rim compatibility. Always match ERT0 codes, not just the nominal “24-inch” size.
Q: Is 24 inch tire good for e-bike?
A: 24-inch tires are well-suited for specific e-bike applications, including folding e-bikes, compact urban bikes, cargo e-bikes (often as rear wheels), and fat bikes. The 24-inch diameter offers advantages in frame geometry for compact designs and in certain cargo configurations. The key is matching the tire’s width, load rating, and casing strength to your specific e-bike’s motor system and intended use.
Q: What is the difference between 24×1.75 and 24×2.0?
A: The difference is primarily width and volume. A 24×1.75 tire is approximately 44mm wide when mounted and inflated, while a 24×2.0 is approximately 50mm wide. The wider tire offers slightly better vibration absorption, lower rolling resistance on imperfect surfaces, and higher load capacity. The narrower tire has marginally lower rolling resistance on smooth surfaces and is lighter. For e-bike applications with motor torque, the 24×2.0 is generally the more versatile choice for urban use.
Q: Which brands make 24 inch e-bike tires?
A: Major manufacturers producing 24-inch e-bike tires include Kenda, Cheng Shin (CST), Bafang, Schwalbe, Michelin, Maxxis, and Innova. Each serves different market segments — Kenda and CST for budget-to-mid applications, Schwalbe and Michelin for premium, Bafang for integrated e-bike systems. The right brand depends on your price point, volume, and target market.
Q: How much does 24 inch tire cost wholesale?
A: Wholesale pricing for 24-inch e-bike tires ranges from approximately $4-8 per unit for budget tier tires at container volume, $8-15 for mid-tier options, and $18-35 for premium brands like Schwalbe, all based on FOB Asia pricing. Actual landed cost varies significantly based on incoterms, freight rates, duties, and your order volume. Always request pricing on at least two incoterms bases and factor in total landed cost rather than unit price alone.
Q: Can I use a 24-inch tire with a hub motor?
A: Yes, but you need to verify that the tire is e-bike rated and that the load index meets your vehicle’s requirements. Hub motors place different stresses on tires than conventional wheel setups — the motor’s torque is delivered directly to the wheel, and the motor’s weight adds unsprung mass. Look for tires specifically labeled as e-bike compatible, and ensure the load rating exceeds your fully loaded vehicle weight per wheel.
Prices vary by region, order quantity, and manufacturer. Contact suppliers directly for FOB quotes. Tire specifications may vary between production batches. Always request samples before bulk orders.
English 
Spanish 
Portuguese 
Russian 
Arabic 
French 
Dutch 
German 
Danish 
